Friday, April 1, 2011

Genetically Modified Showdown: Monsanto Sued By Organic Farmers

 
 

Sent to you by rog via Google Reader:

 
 

via Fast Company by Ariel Schwartz on 3/31/11

Imagine if Apple tried to charge you every time you accidentally glanced at an iPhone on the street. That's basically the policy that Monsanto, an agriculture giant whose patented genes are in 95% of all soybeans and 80% of all corn grown in the U.S, enforces. The company is notorious for suing farmers that the company suspects of violating patents in even inadvertent manners. Monsanto has sued hundreds of farmers and received over $15 million from these patent-violation cases (PDF), which have included incidences of farmers being sued because pollen from nearby farmers' genetically Monsanto-brand genetically modified crops blew over the fence onto their field. Now, finally, organic farmers are fighting back.

The lawsuit, Organic Seed Growers & Trade Association, et al. v. Monsanto, was filed this week on behalf of 12 seed businesses, 26 farms and farmers, and 22 agricultural associations, all of whom question whether Monsanto should have the right to sue farmers for patent infringement if GM seeds inadvertently end up on their property. 

The suit, filed by the Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT), explains:

In the case, PUBPAT is asking Judge Buchwald to declare that if organic farmers are ever contaminated by Monsanto's genetically modified seed, they need not fear also being accused of patent infringement.  One reason justifying this result is that Monsanto's patents on genetically modified seed are invalid because they don't meet the "usefulness" requirement of patent law, according to PUBPAT's Ravicher, plaintiffs' lead attorney in the case.  Evidence cited by PUBPAT in its opening filing today proves that genetically modified seed has negative economic and health effects, while the promised benefits of genetically modified seed --increased production and decreased herbicide use--are false.

Translation: According to the farmers, not only is Monsanto's patent policy out of control, but its patents aren't even useful in the first place--they're harmful. The lawsuit couldn't come at a better time for the organic farming industry; GM alfalfa, a crop whose pollen can travel via wind up to five miles, has been approved by the U.S government. And GM sugar beets, which can easily cross-contaminate with non-GM sugar beets, were also recently approved. Having protection against Monsanto's lawsuits will be a necessity for these farms in the coming years.

Reach Ariel Schwartz via Twitter or email.

[Homepage photo by Flickr user Mahalie]



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Very low levels of radiation found in Wash. milk

 
 

Sent to you by rog via Google Reader:

 
 


Very low levels of radiation turned up in a sample of milk from Washington state, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday, but federal officials assured consumers not to worry.

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Friday, March 18, 2011

Running from good health?

As an Adventist, I have said for years about our lifestyle issues - "We're running fast from our inspired view of health, while everyone else is running to it." This clip from N. T. Wright, Rob Bell, Jamie Oliver: A Disappointment for Adventism? (you can read the whole thing, but it doesn't all pertain to good health....) Of course I've said the same thing about the Sabbath principle, also addressed in this blog link above.

Read on: (the rest of this entry is from the Spectrum blog)

Jamie Oliver
The BBC defined Jamie Oliver as one of the most influential chefs in the western world. The TED conference has also invited him to present a world changing wish to its membership. Jamie is a celebrity chef famous for bringing healthy food to schools both in Britain and parts of America. Again, much like Ellen White, Jamie believes that people's eating patterns define their quality of life. Also like Ellen White and most Adventists since, he has worked tirelessly to educate children and parents how to eat and develop healthy lifestyles. Although he is not known the world over, Jamie is widely recognized in Britain and America as someone who promotes healthy eating.

This demonstrates a third disappointment for Adventism. Since 1863 Adventists have been proclaiming that what humans eat connects body to spirituality. At a time when doctors recommended smoking to clear the lungs, Adventist hospitals prohibited tobacco and defended, even without solid evidence, that tobacco severally damaged users. Over a hundred years later there is now solid scientific evidence for most of Ellen White's claims about tobacco and heathly living. Beyond this, the western world is constantly emphasizing a holistic view to health that sounds remarkably Adventist. Meanwhile, there is a wave of Adventist youth who reject these principles whilst their parents stop reading Ellen White altogether!

Beyond this, the disappointment is that Jamie Oliver is a single chef who has captured the attention of governments and the media. The Adventist Church has multiple health institutions and nutrition degrees taught in various universities around the world. Despite this structure, Adventists have only been slightly influential due a National Geographic report on Loma Linda and the independent documentary The Adventists, by Martin Doblmeier. It is indeed disappointing that Seventh-day Adventists could have been the mainstream voice calling proclaiming health in the last few decades. Instead, we struggle to inspire our own membership to lead healthier lifestyles. To add insult to injury, when Jamie Oliver was called by ABC to produce a series of documentaries in the United States, he called for Christian pastors to join his cause for healthier living. This would have given a great voice to any Adventist who stepped forward. However, the main Christian to join him is a Baptist pastor from Virginia.

Ask the Readers: How to Talk to Friends and Family?

Okay, I know the below isn't about food and forks over support kinds of things. But this RSS feed I get has the same basic advice I seek to follow when talking with people about money, about food, about parenting and even about God. Read it through to the end, even if you don't need to hear about money, at least see the key points:

* Lead by Example
* Tell your Story
* Use the soft sell

These all come together to make a better evangelist for food, for money, for parenting or even for God. Despite the reputation of the term "evangelist" notice that Jesus never chased anyone.... Think about it!

 
 

Sent to you by rog via Google Reader:

 
 


Last spring, Andy submitted a question he hoped readers could help him with. I promised I'd post it…and then went to Alaska for ten days and forgot. Well, Andy's a patient man. And persistent. Last week, he dropped me a line again because he's still wondering: How do you give advice about money to your family (and friends)?

Here's Andy's story:

My family had plenty of money when I was growing up, but we never talked about the subject.

My father was always very frugal (a trait I inherited, for better or for worse). I had an allowance, which I would sometimes spend on baseball cards, or other times save up for something big in the future. I guess I kind of followed my parents lead and never really bought overly expensive stuff, or much Stuff in general.

My brother is quite a bit different than me. Throughout college (and even post college) he made some common financial decisions for someone that age and ended up with a lot of debt. Even now that he's older and has a family, I still feel like he struggles with money. I really, really, REALLY want to approach him and offer him some advice, but I just don't know how. A similar situation exists with my wife's father and step-mom. Maybe my apprehension is because these family members are older than me? Maybe it's easier to talk to people about money who I know manage their money well versus people who don't?

I feel like I've done a damn good job at managing my money during my college and first few post-college years. I feel like I have a lot of good knowledge to share, and I could really help my family members, but money seems to be an awkward and touchy subject in our society. I'm not sure if it's a personal thing or if it's this way with everyone — talking about personal finance with (most) friends and family is kind of taboo.

What's a concerned family member to do? Become a professional financial planner? Bite the bullet, take the bull by the horns (insert your cliche of choice here) and just approach my family members honestly and directly?

In his most recent e-mail, Andy told me it's not just family members he wishes he could talk to, but friends, too.

"I've noticed it's a pretty big issue among friends as well," he wrote. "I feel like most of my peers lack financial skills and responsibility. (That said, the flip-side of that viewpoint is that I'm just being a cheapskate, saving too much, and people can spend their money however they want!)"

Outside Looking In
This is actually a situation I wrestle with from time to time. I think we all do. I see friends (and family members) who are struggling, and see some obvious things they could do, but I don't know how to help.

For instance, I have one friend who refuses to accept responsibility for her income. She's a smart woman, but she lives in squalor. She blames her state on everything and everybody else. She doesn't see that she could help herself by being willing to work two (or more) jobs, by avoiding the bars, by giving up cigarettes and pot. In her mind, her lousy income just shows how unlucky she is. It's not her fault. Any practical advice falls on deaf ears.

I have another friend for whom only the best will do. Though his family is pinched financially (they often complain about money), he constantly talks about the new things he wants — and they're always the most expensive possible examples. He buys (or wants to buy) the most expensive computers, clothes, and kitchen supplies. He eats at the most expensive restaurants. And so on. I've tried to offer casual advice — "Maybe you can find a good deal at a thrift store.", "Let's eat at the corner cafe." — but it's never well received. Instead, I just don't say anything.

I wonder if that's how people used to feel about me back when I struggled with debt? Most people never said anything. Maybe they didn't see the problem, or maybe they didn't feel it was their place to share.

Talking with Friends and Family About Money
Why is money a taboo topic? Why aren't more people willing to talk about their finances? I think it's because nobody likes to be judged. Everyone thinks they're doing the best they can possibly do — and even if they don't think that, they don't like to be called out.

Often, your friends don't actually think they're doing the wrong thing. As Andy suggests, they might think you're a cheapskate. Each person is in a different place. Though you may have friends and family members who could profit from what you've learned, if they're not ready to listen, you run the risk of doing more harm than good when you offer advice.

In the past, I've recommended the following as subtle ways you can help someone who's struggling:

  • Lead by example. Suggest cutting back on the family gift exchange this year. When you go out to dinner with a friend, choose cheaper alternatives. Bring home books and CDs and DVDs from the library. Don't make a big deal out of things — just do them. Rather than goad your friends and family into saving, be an example of what can happen through smart money choices. (I talk excitedly about how cutting back on other stuff has allowed me travel, for instance.)
  • Be willing to answer questions. When I was struggling with debt and poor choices, I could see that certain people in my life (such as my wife) had their finances under control. Sometimes I would ask questions. I asked my cousin about mutual funds, and he explained them to me. For a time, I even put money into them. (Then I pulled it out to buy a computer.) Be available as a resource.
  • Use the soft sell. When my friend Michael listened to my complaints about money in 2003, he didn't make a big deal out of it. He told me his financial story, and then mentioned a book he liked called Your Money or Your Life. He didn't lecture. He didn't try to convert me. He simply spent a few minutes explaining how he'd solved his problems, and then he let it go. A few days later, a copy of Your Money or Your Life appeared in my mailbox, and I knew it was from him. That was enough.

I'm curious how other Get Rich Slowly readers have handled this kind of situation. How do you encourage your family and friends to make smart choices with money without making them defensive or angry? What mistakes have you made in the past? What techniques have you found that work? Does a person have to hit rock bottom before they're ready to listen?

---
Related Articles at Get Rich Slowly - Personal Finance That Makes Sense.:



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Watch SNL's High Fructose Corn Syrup Commercial Parody

I recommend watching the REAL commercial first - it's below the SNL one - then watch SNL's commercial, because it will make it all the more funnier! If you aren't outraged by the real commercial, I wonder... It's just propaganda, that's all. SNL points this out very well.

http://eater.com/archives/2011/03/13/saturday-night-live-high-fructose-corn-syrup-commercial.php

Failure vs. Winning

When it comes to diet and eating right, it seems as if America is winning at the wrong things. We're winning at the game of taste. We're winning at the game of obesity. We're winning at the game of heart disease. We're winning at the game of cancer. We're winning at the game of "I want what I want"

Notice I didn't say we're winning those problems, we're winning in a different way.... Yesterday, at the "Get Motivated" seminar, one of the speakers attributed this quote to Adrian Rogers: "Failure us succeeding at the wrong things."

Oh yeah! We're winning at the wrong things. We need to be winning at good health. We need to be winning at life enjoyment. We need to be winning at longevity. We need to be winning and getting rid of the above problems - and we can with a firm commitment to principle.

Yesterday at the lunch break, we went to Chipotle and I ordered a veggie burrito. Skipped the sour cream, skipped the cheese. There's plenty more to add. But my daughter got both of those on hers and when she couldn't finish it and handed it over to her father - who thought he was about to die from malnourishment before lunch - took it and at the last 1/3rd of hers.

I'm really good with food principle until my mind thinks I'm starving (which I'm not, nor ever have been). If we would have gone in an hour earlier to this same restaurant and the same scenario played out, I likely would have said "nope, I'm fine" for two reasons. 1) one of Chipotle's burrito's is really enough food, and 2) Out of principle for eating a completely vegan diet. 

But when I feel as if I'm famished, get my mind in gear that I don't care what I eat as long as it's BIG, it gets me in trouble. This wasn't trouble, and it wasn't likely life-threatening. But I'm really saying, I wasn't living on principle anymore. I was winning at the wrong thing. I need to learn to eat to live, not live to eat. How about you?

Friday, March 11, 2011

The Engine 2 Diet

I'm currently reading Rip Esselstyn's book, "The Engine 2 Diet." (watch the video at:  http://engine2diet.com ) Rip was a world-class triathlete for many years and when he retired from that (still competing though), he became a firefighter. In the course of a friendly argument one day at the station in Austin, TX, he and two other buddies took a bet to see who had the lowest cholesterol. Rip was sure he had the lowest, but didn't. And that surprised him, but he left it to the single indulgences of his once/year cheeseburger that he had just eaten. His cholesterol that day was 199.

Mine, as you read recently, was 196. My HDL was 56 and should be ≥ 46. My LDL was 126 and should be ≤ 80. According to Esselstyn, the H in the HDL stands for "healthy," whereas the L in the LDL stands for "lethal." LOL.

35% of all heart attacks happen with a total cholesterol between 150-200 - considered by all major agencies to be rock solid great numbers. (this according to the famous Framingham study) But there are no instances of a heart attack when your overall number is below 150 mg/dL. 

But according to Rip (he is the son of the Famous Surgeon Caldwell Esselstyn of the Cleveland Clinic) if you get on his diet, what the book is about, you can see amazing results in as little as two weeks. 

I'm only on page 69 of 270 pages. But of the actual reading material (not including recipes, etc.) I'm pretty close to half-way through. Good stories, good information, on target. As I read the numbers of where my Total Cholesterol and my LDLs should be, I sought forgiveness from God for the way I had been mistreating my body. I thought I was unstoppable. I thought I could eat those "occasional" cookies at the church. I thought I was healthy.... 

No more! I'm now a man on a mission and I am headed in the right direction. I plan on integrating many of these recipes and adding to my current exercise plan. I'm excited about the future, but no longer cocky about how healthy I am. I'm going to do a second blood draw in 4-6 weeks and see if there has been any significant changes. Stay tuned....